Skip to main content
Glama
FailEcho

FailEcho

Official
by FailEcho
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to FailEcho

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claimidx by claimidx

      claimidxofficial

      claimidx
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query a public signed ledger of known failures and fixes before retrying, then ingest, confirm, fail, and share dense claims so subsequent agents avoid paying the same cost.
      23
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • learned-experience

      fitz2882
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to persistently recall, apply, and reinforce solutions to previously solved problems across different models and tools, so mistakes are not repeated.
      14
      397
      1
      MIT

    • carapace-mcp

      Morpheis
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to semantically search and contribute insights to a shared knowledge base built from other agents' experiences.
      5
      13
      MIT

    • knoten

      BY571
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query and commit to a research graph that remembers failed experiments, ensuring reproducibility and preventing redundant work.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct part of the failure intelligence lifecycle: contributing a failure, checking known failures, reporting a recovery outcome, and reporting a success. The descriptions make the boundaries explicit, including when to use each (before retrying, after acting, etc.). No two tools appear interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: report_tool_failure, check_tool_failure, report_recovery_outcome, report_tool_success. The prefixes report_ and check_ clearly distinguish write versus read operations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a focused failure telemetry network. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct telemetry action: failure report, failure lookup, recovery outcome, and success report. Nothing feels redundant or missing from the minimal viable set.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full loop for failure intelligence: reporting failures, checking them, reporting recovery outcomes, and reporting successes to compute accurate failure rates. The presence of report_tool_success is especially important for denominator data. No obvious lifecycle gap remains for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources