Skip to main content
Glama
Fabio662

Yield Agentic Hub

by Fabio662
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Yield Agentic Hub

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • dingdawg-governance

      dingdawg
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Universal governance layer for AI agents — MCP-native, fail-closed, LNN interpretability. Governed receipts, IPFS audit proofs, and rollback for any agent in any framework.
      3
      56 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • Proofpane by Proofpane

      Proofpaneofficial

      Proofpane
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A governance proxy for AI tools — every MCP/agent tool call is policy-gated, secret-redacted, and written to a hash-chained, offline-verifiable audit trail.
      13
      MIT

    • mneme-ai

      patsa2561-art
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate through a local, signed boundary that blocks prompt injection and secret leakage, verifies outputs, preserves cross-session memory, and provides offline-verifiable receipts. It also exposes 900+ MCP tools for discoverable agent actions.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., audit vs. email sequence vs. payment), but slight overlap exists between yax_enrich_lead_data and yax_score_leads (both deal with leads) and between yax_run_secure_workflow and yax_control_workflow (both manage workflows). Descriptions clarify differences.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent pattern 'yax_verb_noun' in snake_case, e.g., yax_check_policy, yax_forecast_cash_flow. No mixing of styles or irregular names.

    Tool Count5/5

    18 tools is appropriate for a multifunctional agentic hub covering audit, email, invoices, leads, workflow, payments, and attestation. Each tool serves a clear niche without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers major business operations (CRM, invoicing, payments, compliance, workflow), but lacks tools for direct policy editing or advanced CRM management. Minor gaps exist for a fully autonomous agent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources