httptoolkit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to httptoolkit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to capture and analyze HTTP/HTTPS traffic from Android devices. It supports smart searching of network requests and provides tools for detailed traffic analysis via natural language.11231MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for mitmproxy that lets any MCP client analyze, intercept, and replay HTTP/HTTPS traffic.9MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Android emulator automation via ADB.1751 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to intercept, inspect, and modify HTTP traffic, with tools for searching, filtering, and managing captured requests and interceptors.26 npm8MIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server built on mitmproxy that lets LLMs capture, inspect, replay, and modify HTTP traffic through a set of focused tools.137-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to control HTTP Toolkit for intercepting, inspecting, and debugging HTTP(S) traffic from browsers, mobile devices, and Docker containers. It provides tools for server management, interceptor activation, and sending HTTP requests through natural language commands.2314 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with no ambiguity between them. For example, adb tools are separate from proxy control tools, and rule tools are distinct in their effects (delay, error, mock, redirect, modify). Even similar tools like add_mock_rule vs add_modify_request_rule are clearly differentiated in descriptions.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., proxy_start, add_delay_rule), and adb tools are grouped with a prefix. Minor deviations like classify_blob and decode_protobuf are still understandable, and overall the naming is predictable.
35 tools is on the higher side but justifiable for a comprehensive HTTP interception toolkit. The tools cover many subdomains (emulator setup, proxy control, rules, traffic inspection, utilities), and each tool serves a specific function without redundancy. The count is slightly above the typical ideal range but still reasonable.
The tool set is highly complete for its domain, covering proxy lifecycle, rule manipulation, traffic capture, search, export, import, and emulator-specific setup including transparent interception and certificate installation. Only minor gaps like VPN mode control are missing, but these are OS-level features not expected in a proxy tool.