zernio_get_post_logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It does not mention any permissions, rate limits, data retrieval costs, or response details. This is a significant gap for a tool that retrieves logs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is clear and front-loaded. It efficiently conveys the purpose without extra words. It earns a high score but not a 5 due to lack of structure (e.g., no bullets or separate sections).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, so the description should provide more context about the log entries structure. While it lists example log types, it does not explain the return format or pagination. For a simple retrieval tool, it is adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for both parameters. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema; it only hints at the log content. Since schema coverage is high, baseline is 3, and there is no additional value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool retrieves activity logs for a specific post, listing types of events (publishing attempts, edits, approval changes). It uses a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'activity logs for a specific post', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'zernio_get_post'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among many sibling tools, there is no mention of contexts where this tool is preferred over others like 'zernio_get_publishing_logs' or 'zernio_get_post_analytics'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.