zernio_connect_telegram_verify

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, description only states the action without disclosing any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions needed, or error handling. The description carries the full burden but fails to provide depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose without extraneous information. Front-loaded and appropriately sized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (2 params, no output schema), the description is minimal. It does not explain the expected outcome, what happens on success/failure, or how the code is obtained, leaving gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with clear descriptions for both params; description adds no additional semantic context beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action: completing Telegram bot connection by submitting a verification code. It implies a two-step process (start then verify) but does not explicitly name the sibling tool zernio_connect_telegram_start.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear prerequisite ('after the user has messaged the Zernio bot'), but does not mention when not to use it or contrast with sibling tools like zernio_connect_telegram_start or zernio_check_telegram_connection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.