Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hyperpanes-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Terminal multiplexer MCP server for orchestrating parallel AI agents. Manages workspaces, panes, surfaces with send_input/read_screen/spawn_agent/stop_agent tools. Supports Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor CLI agents with lifecycle management, browser automation, and agent status push via Claude --channels.
      10
      27
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Terminal MCP server for AI coding agents with persistent PTY sessions, ring-buffer incremental reads, headless xterm screen capture, multi-agent orchestration, and a real-time web dashboard.
      17 npm
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server to control Onda terminal from AI agents, providing tools for splitting panes, running commands, managing tabs and workspaces, and orchestrating multi-agent workflows across multiple windows.
      39
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for driving tmux sessions, windows, panes, sending keystrokes, and reading pane output locally or over SSH, enabling real-time collaborative pairing with AI.
      71
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 47 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct, but there is some potential overlap between messaging/input tools like send_message, queue_prompt, prompt_pane, and send_input, which all involve sending text to a pane. Descriptions are detailed enough to separate them, but the boundaries are not perfectly obvious at a glance.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming convention is predominantly verb_noun in snake_case (e.g., launch_workspace, lock_pane, enqueue_task), which is consistent. Minor deviations like whoami and send_to_parent break the pattern slightly, but overall the convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 47 tools, this server is far above the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the tool count reflects a broad feature set (panes, workspaces, queues, messaging, projects, speech), it exceeds the threshold where usability suffers, making it feel bloated and harder to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the domain comprehensively: pane lifecycle, workspace management, queue operations, project management, messaging, and app control. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit window/tab listing tool, no move/resize pane), but agents can work around them using existing tools, so the surface is largely complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive