Skip to main content
Glama
Expert-Integrado

Conexa MCP

POST /charge (Charge)

create_charge

Create a charge in Conexa by specifying sales IDs, invoicing method, due date, and optional notes.

Instructions

Criação de uma cobrança avulsa no sistema Conexa.

Exemplo de body: { "salesIds": [188087, 188088], "invoicingMethodId": 2, "dueDate": "2024-12-01", "notes": "Lorem ipsum eget morbi" }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYesCorpo JSON da requisição (campos na descrição da tool)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral details beyond the creation intent, offering minimal additional transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with one sentence and an example, all front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing comprehensive information: no mention of required fields beyond the example, no output description, no error conditions. The openWorldHint suggests additional fields may be accepted, but this is not clarified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'body' has a vague description deferring to the tool description. The example provides field names but no definitions, formats, or required/optional status, insufficiently compensating for the lack of schema definition for internal fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool creates an individual charge in Conexa. It is specific but does not differentiate from sibling create tools like create_bill or create_sale.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives. The example shows fields but no context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Expert-Integrado/conexa-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server