POST /room/booking/:id/checkout (Conexa Coworking > Check-out)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and non-destructive (destructiveHint=false). The description adds no behavioral traits beyond stating it's a 'registration' of checkout. No contradictory information, but it lacks details like prerequisites or side effects (e.g., status updates, email sending).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: first states purpose, second lists body field. No redundant information, front-loaded with the core action. Every sentence is essential and well-structured for quick parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, and the description does not explain the response or return value. For a checkout operation, it would be helpful to know what is returned (e.g., confirmation, updated booking). The description is complete for input but lacks output context, given the tool's moderate complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers both parameters (id, body) with 100% coverage. The description adds value by explaining the body field contains sendEmail boolean, which is not detailed in the schema. It also clarifies that id is the bookingId. The schema's additionalProperties allows flexibility, but the description provides concrete guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description clearly state it's for checking out a room booking by ID ('Registro de Check-Out de Sala através do ID da reserva'). It uses a specific verb ('checkout') and resource ('room booking'), distinguishing it from siblings like create_checkin or create_checkout.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates usage for checkout via booking ID but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_checkout or cancel_room_booking. No when-not or alternative guidance is provided, though the purpose is clear enough for an AI to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.