Mne Reset Session

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly states that all loaded objects and figures are cleared and emphasizes that the action is irreversible, giving an agent a strong safety signal. It does not detail hidden side effects, but none are suggested by the scope of the statement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences with no filler: the core action is front-loaded, and 'Irreversible' is a necessary warning that earns its place. The description is optimally sized for a simple stateless utility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter reset tool with an output schema, the description fully covers the key aspects: what is cleared, the fresh-start outcome, and the irreversible consequence. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to invoke it safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters and 100% coverage, so there is no parameter meaning to add. The description appropriately mentions nothing about parameters. Per the zero-parameter baseline, this is a solid score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Clear') and resource ('all loaded objects and figures from the session'), making the tool's purpose immediately obvious. It is clearly distinguishable from the many analysis and plotting siblings, since it resets session state rather than operating on data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'starting fresh' gives clear contextual guidance for when this tool is appropriate, and 'Irreversible' warns against casual use. There are no similar reset tools among the siblings, so exclusion alternatives are not needed, though explicit 'use when' wording would have been slightly stronger.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.