Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MNE-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tool pairs overlap heavily: mne_compute_connectivity/mne_connectivity, mne_compute_tfr/mne_tfr_morlet, and mne_describe/mne_get_info all have very similar purposes despite detailed caveats. An agent could easily select the wrong one, especially when the names differ only by verb prefix or not at all.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow the readable mne_<verb>_<object> pattern, but there are notable exceptions like mne_connectivity, mne_tfr_morlet, mne_decode, and mne_decoding_group_test that break the convention. The consistent mne_ prefix helps, but the mix of verb-first and noun-first names reduces predictability.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 41 tools, this is well above the 25-tool threshold and feels heavy for an MCP surface, even for a broad neuroimaging domain. Several overlapping connectivity/TFR/plotting tools could be consolidated, and mne_run_code already provides an escape hatch for unusual cases.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full MNE analysis lifecycle: loading, preprocessing, epoching, averaging, ICA, TFR, connectivity, source localization, decoding, plotting, and saving. Minor gaps exist, such as dedicated tools for loading saved Epochs/Evoked objects or removing individual session objects, but these are workaroundable via mne_run_code.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive