Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ee-mcp-public

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to BuzzerBeater's public API through MCP tools for retrieving team, player, match, market, national team, and other game data.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables credential-free, read-only access to selected public market-data routes via 13 typed MCP tools covering asset mapping, metadata, quotes, listings, global metrics, Fear & Greed, Altcoin Season, and CMC index data.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying Kiwify sales, subscriptions, products, and affiliates via the official API. Read-only access for viewing data.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to Meta Ads API, enabling campaign management, creative analysis, targeting research, and performance analytics via 39 tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local MCP-capable agents to read-only query Zhangchui's already-published Warhammer 40K reports, matchups, army rosters, and statistical definitions over a fixed-route HTTPS public API, without admin accounts, SSH, or database credentials. It exposes six tools for listing and fetching reports, matchups, rosters, and data notes, with release-ID pinning, pagination, and explicit handling of unprepared or unavailable data.
      14
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have near-identical names and purposes, such as getApiKeys/listApiKeys, getProviders/listProviders, and getWebhooks/listWebhookEvents, which only differ by internal API module. With 43 tools, an agent can easily select the wrong variant despite reading descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set is consistently camelCase with get/list prefixes, but it mixes getX and listX for collection endpoints and creates duplicate-looking names across the email and payment domains. The pattern is readable but not predictable enough to be considered mostly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    43 tools is well above a comfortable MCP surface and many are near-duplicates (getApiKeys/listApiKeys, getProviders/listProviders). The server covers two domains, but the number feels heavy rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    As a read-only/public surface, it exposes a broad set of list and detail endpoints across email and payment resources. However, several resources are list-only with no detail lookup, and there are no write or management operations, so lifecycle coverage is incomplete for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues