update_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description implies modification but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or whether updates are additive or destructive. The return type is mentioned but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely short and front-loaded. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity, making it minimally acceptable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite simple structure and one parameter, the description omits critical details about the 'settings' object structure and expected behavior. Output schema exists but is not shown; description only says 'Updated settings' without specifics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description only restates 'Settings dictionary to update' with no explanation of valid keys, format, or constraints. Fails to compensate for the schema's lack of descriptive detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Update application settings.' The verb 'update' and resource 'application settings' are specific. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_settings (read) and other update tools for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create/update for specific resources. No prerequisites, context, or exclusions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.