Skip to main content
Glama
Epochal-dev

Open Notebook MCP Server

by Epochal-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Open Notebook MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • notebooklm-mcp

      jacob-bd
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to programmatically interact with Google NotebookLM, allowing them to create and manage notebooks, add sources, query content, generate audio/video, and perform research tasks through natural language commands.
      50
      12,935 PyPI
      6,161
      MIT

    • notebooklm-mcp-cli

      hungln105-cell
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to programmatically access and manage Gemini Notebook (formerly Google NotebookLM), including creating notebooks, adding sources, querying content, generating studio content, downloading artifacts, and running batch or cross-notebook workflows through natural language.
      49
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but 'ask_question' and 'ask_simple' are very similar in functionality and arguments, potentially causing confusion for an agent. Other tools like CRUD operations are well-separated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (e.g., create_notebook, delete_source). No mixing of conventions or irregular names.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 33 tools, the server is on the higher side but still reasonable given the multiple resources (notebooks, notes, sources, chat sessions, models, settings) and additional utility tools. It's slightly over the typical well-scoped range but not excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers CRUD operations for all major resources and includes question-asking and search features. Minor gaps like import/export or bulk operations are missing, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources