Skip to main content
Glama

mcp-vet

A trust-scan framework for MCP servers: evidence-backed verdicts before you install — usable from any harness.

uvx --from mcp-vetting mcp-vet @modelcontextprotocol/server-fetch   # one command
uvx --from mcp-vetting mcp-vet ./my-server --harness hermes          # verdict + config for YOUR harness
uvx --from mcp-vetting mcp-vet pypi:fastmcp --json --gate            # machine-readable, CI-friendly

Verdicts: SAFE_TO_INSTALL · REVIEW_BEFORE_INSTALL · DO_NOT_INSTALL — every finding carries file:line and plain-English evidence. A verdict is a gate for humans, never a black box.


The flow

  1. Vet any target: npm / PyPI / GitHub / local directory.

  2. Read the verdict + findings (evidence, not vibes).

  3. Configure: pick your harness, paste the emitted config block.

  4. Gate it in CI with --gate (exit 1 on DO_NOT_INSTALL).

Related MCP server: tooltrust-mcp

Three surfaces, one engine

Surface

Use

Library

from mcp_vet import vet, PolicyVetResult (verdict, findings, provenance)

CLI

mcp-vet <target> [--json] [--gate] [--strict] [--harness ...]

MCP server

mcp-vet-server — tools: vet_server, vet_directory, get_verdict, list_scanners, list_harnesses, get_config

Targets

npm:pkg            npm registry + tarball        (bare names default to npm)
pypi:pkg           PyPI JSON + sdist/wheel
gh:owner/repo      GitHub metadata + source
./path             local source directory (offline)

Harness adapters (any harness, paste-ready)

--harness emits the exact config block for your tool:

harness

output

generic

universal mcpServers block

claude-code

claude mcp add <name> -- <cmd> <args>

cursor

.cursor/mcp.json

vscode

.vscode/mcp.json (VS Code servers schema)

hermes

~/.hermes/config.yaml mcp_servers block

--harness all prints every adapter. Programmatic: config_for(harness, ServerSpec(...)).

Policy (calibrated defaults, --strict to disable)

Static analysis must not cry wolf. Defaults, learned by vetting the real ecosystem:

  • Examples/tests/docs are informationalexamples/, tests/, docs/ code can't block a package on its own (strict restores raw findings).

  • Fake secrets don't countsk-test-…, example, xxxx literals are placeholders, not exfiltration.

  • Trusted-host auth is normal — credentials sent to a host named in the file (constant or literal) is client auth; HIGH only when the destination host appears nowhere in the code.

  • Host interpolation → REVIEWhttps://${host}/… is a strong signal, but static analysis can't prove the host is user-controlled; a human decides. Strict mode blocks on it.

JSON schema (stable)

{
  "target": "npm:some-server", "kind": "npm", "version": "1.2.3",
  "verdict": {
    "level": "REVIEW_BEFORE_INSTALL",
    "summary": "3 finding(s); 0 high, 1 medium.",
    "findings": [
      {"scanner": "ssrf", "severity": "medium", "message": "...",
       "file": "dist/index.js", "line": 41, "evidence": "fetch(url)"}
    ]
  },
  "provenance": {"version": "1.2.3", "license": "MIT",
                 "source_url": "git+https://...", "source": "npm"},
  "files_scanned": 214, "duration_s": 1.7
}

Scanners

ssrf · exec · secrets · auth · provenance · deps — static, local-first (no telemetry, no cloud round-trips; the cache is a local SQLite file under ~/.cache/mcp-vet).

Verification

python3 -m unittest discover -s tests    # 48 checks: golden corpus is the quality bar

The golden corpus is the contract: known-good fixtures must never carry HIGH findings; malicious fixtures must always block. The ecosystem scan (scripts/ecosystem_scan.py) keeps the tool honest against real packages.

Honest limits

Static analysis has false positives and negatives. A verdict is a gate for humans, not a replacement for them — read the evidence. Sandboxed execution, egress audit-trail, and live CVE lookups are planned for v2.

A
license - permissive license
-
quality - not tested
B
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for https://oathe.ai security audits. Runtime behavioral analysis and security scanner for Ai systems. Check trust scores before installing MCP servers, plugins, or AI agent skills.
    Last updated
    5
    23
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Scans MCP servers for prompt injection, supply chain attacks, excessive permissions, and code execution risks. Includes an offline blacklist that catches known-compromised packages like LiteLLM 1.82.7/1.82.8 and Trivy with zero latency.
    Last updated
    19
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Security scanning for MCP servers from the inside out. Provides runtime inspection, AST-based static analysis, config audit, dependency analysis, and OWASP MCP Top 10 compliance in a single MCP server.
    Last updated
    55
    16
    5
    MIT

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • Independent A-F trust grade for any MCP server, watched for drift. Free, never for sale.

  • Scans MCP servers for tool poisoning, prompt injection and supply chain risks.

  • Security scanner for MCP servers. Detect vulnerabilities, prompt injection, and tool poisoning.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ElDiegolar/mcp-vet'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server