save_to_inspiration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states it bookmarks a post, implying a write operation, but lacks details on side effects, idempotency, or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence front-loads the core action. Could be more concise by removing parenthetical 'by id, from the current feed', but still efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple function with 2 params and output schema, description covers the basic action but lacks details on return value, success/failure, or constraints. Adequate for a straightforward bookmarking tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. Only 'post id' is mentioned in description; 'notes' parameter is not explained. The description adds little beyond parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Bookmark' and resource 'post', and distinguishes from siblings like 'remove_from_inspiration' and 'list_inspiration'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from similar siblings like 'record_preference'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for bookmarking posts from the current feed, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. No mention of alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.