remove_from_inspiration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a destructive write operation ('Remove') but provides no details on side effects, required permissions, or whether the operation is reversible. The return value or confirmation is not mentioned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no redundant words. It front-loades the action and resource, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema and no annotations, the description omits critical context such as what the tool returns upon success, whether it errors on invalid id, or how it relates to sibling tools like 'save_to_inspiration' or 'list_inspiration'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds that the removal is 'by post id', confirming the parameter's purpose. However, it doesn't explain what 'post_id' refers to or where to obtain it, leaving ambiguity for an agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove'), the resource ('a saved inspiration item'), and the identifier ('by post id'). It distinguishes from siblings like 'save_to_inspiration' (opposite) and 'remove_artist' (different resource), but doesn't explicitly differentiate from 'reset_seen' or 'clear' operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., 'remove_artist' for artists, or 'reset_seen' for clearing seen state). No prerequisites or context for safe invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.