EasyTopic: create Documentation page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses key behaviors: admin check before creation, specific error response ('notProjectAdmin'), and that parentTopicId null means top-level. No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden and does it well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words, but the first sentence is somewhat long. Overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters and no output schema, the description explains permission flow and parent parameter well, but fails to describe other parameters (topicTypeId, descriptionHtml) and the return value. Adequate but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning only for 'parentTopicId' (null = top-level), but does not explain 'title', 'projectId', 'topicTypeId', or 'descriptionHtml'. Leaves significant gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (creates), the resource (Documentation page/Topic), and the context (under given parent, in a Documentation Project). It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_topics or get_topic by specifying creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use (to create a page), the admin prerequisite, and the error handling ('Ask the human to promote the bot'). It implies when not to use if not admin, but lacks explicit comparison to alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.