A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceEnables agents to call typed code-review and content-moderation decision tools, returning structured verdicts, probabilities, and confidence-gated actions.
2
MIT
typesafe-as-a-judge
by E-FL
Related Servers
Alternatives to typesafe-as-a-judge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to verify claims, classify states, screen content, make decisions, and extract fields using five judgment tools backed by TypeSafe/OpenRouter.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding agents to send natural language and JSON application state to a judge tool that returns typed judgments (yes/no probability, choice, or score) with model and usage metadata, and fails gracefully without blocking workflows.270 npm5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to query files, logs, and search results through TypeSafe Jev's typed, probabilistic answers, so they retrieve only the needed conclusion instead of raw context. Supports classification, scoring, yes/no checks, extraction, page ranking, and injection screening.11346 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives any coding agent a shared local decision layer for classifying, checking, scoring, and ranking items with calibrated probabilities, plus deterministic project fact discovery, all through one install. Every answer is advisory and marked auto or review, so the host agent can abstain or escalate instead of guessing.32 PyPI2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to ask typed yes/no, choice, score, and bounding-box questions about code, diffs, logs, and screenshots, returning structured decisions with calibrated confidence, caching, and cost controls.3346 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools are individually clear, but typesafe_judge can execute Choice, Score, and Noul questions, which conceptually overlaps with route, rank, extract, and verify. The descriptions provide enough context to help avoid misselection, but the boundaries are not always crisp.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share a uniform typesafe_ prefix and snake_case style, making the family recognizable. The majority use verb-style names like route, rank, extract, verify, and judge, though usage_summary and escalation_gate are noun-style deviations.
Tool Count5/5
Seven tools is well-scoped for a specialized judging and evaluation server. Each tool addresses a distinct phase or concern without feeling padded or redundant.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the core judge lifecycle: route, rank, extract, verify, batch judging, usage tracking, and escalation gating. Minor gaps such as a dedicated audit or explanation tool are possible, but they are not obvious blockers for the server's stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues