Skip to main content
Glama
DynamicEndpoints

BOD-25-01-CSA-Microsoft-Policy-MCP

complete_auth_methods_migration

Complete authentication methods migration to meet CSA BOD 25-01 requirements for Microsoft 365 cloud services.

Instructions

Set Authentication Methods Manage Migration to Complete (MS.AAD.3.4v1)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The main execution logic for the 'complete_auth_methods_migration' tool. It updates the authentication methods policy via Microsoft Graph API to mark the migration as 'completed'.
    private async completeAuthMethodsMigration() {
      try {
        // Set migration status using Microsoft Graph API
        await this.graphClient
          .api('/policies/authenticationMethodsPolicy')
          .patch({
            migrationState: 'completed',
          });
    
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: 'Authentication Methods migration marked as complete successfully',
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error: unknown) {
        throw new McpError(
          ErrorCode.InternalError,
          `Failed to complete auth methods migration: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}`
        );
      }
    }
  • Tool registration in the listTools response, including name, description, and input schema (no parameters required).
    {
      name: 'complete_auth_methods_migration',
      description: 'Set Authentication Methods Manage Migration to Complete (MS.AAD.3.4v1)',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {},
      },
    },
  • Dispatch case in the CallToolRequest handler that routes execution to the completeAuthMethodsMigration method.
    case 'complete_auth_methods_migration':
      return await this.completeAuthMethodsMigration();
  • Input schema definition for the tool (empty object, no input parameters).
    inputSchema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {},
    },
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies a state change ('Set...to Complete') suggesting a mutation, but doesn't disclose permissions needed, side effects, or what happens after completion. This is a significant gap for a tool that likely modifies system state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's action without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized for a no-parameter tool, though it could be slightly clearer in its phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'migration' involves, what 'complete' signifies, or the expected outcome, leaving critical behavioral and contextual gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema coverage, so the schema fully documents the absence of inputs. The description doesn't need to add parameter details, and it appropriately doesn't mention any, earning a baseline high score for parameter clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action ('Set Authentication Methods Manage Migration to Complete') and references a specific resource (MS.AAD.3.4v1), which gives a vague purpose. However, it doesn't clearly explain what 'migration' entails or what 'complete' means in this context, making it somewhat ambiguous despite having specific terminology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description lacks context about prerequisites, timing, or related tools, leaving the agent without direction on appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DynamicEndpoints/Automated-BOD-25-01-CISA-Microsoft-Policies-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server