Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
roundtableA

召开圆桌会议:司仪自动分诊(白天桌=事业/技术决策,夜晚桌=人生探讨),点名 3-5 位相关顾问按发言契约轮流发言,最后输出统一格式的会议纪要。用户无需手动挑选专家。

consultA

向智囊团中的单个专家咨询问题。选择一位专家,获取其专业视角的建议。

reviewA

多角色会诊:邀请多位专家从不同角度评审方案,提供综合建议。

brainstormC

头脑风暴:多位专家从不同角度发散思考,产生创新想法。

critiqueC

设计评审:从多个维度批判性地审视方案,找出问题和改进点。

suggestB

场景建议:根据具体场景和约束条件,给出可执行的方案建议。

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Consult is clearly distinct as a single-expert tool, but review, critique, brainstorm, and roundtable all involve multiple experts generating input, and the boundaries between comprehensive review, critical critique, and divergent brainstorming can be blurry. Descriptions help, but some tools could be confused depending on the user's intent.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names are single lowercase words, which gives a consistent visual and stylistic pattern. Most are verbs (consult, review, critique, suggest, brainstorm), though 'roundtable' is a noun used as an action, so it is a minor deviation.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is well-scoped for an advisory/council server. Each tool represents a distinct consultation mode without bloating the surface, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The server covers single-expert advice, structured group discussion, multi-angle review, brainstorming, critique, and scenario-based suggestions, which is a fairly complete advisory toolkit. A minor gap is the lack of tools for managing or listing available experts, but users can still interact without it.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues