wise-council-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| roundtableA | 召开圆桌会议:司仪自动分诊(白天桌=事业/技术决策,夜晚桌=人生探讨),点名 3-5 位相关顾问按发言契约轮流发言,最后输出统一格式的会议纪要。用户无需手动挑选专家。 |
| consultA | 向智囊团中的单个专家咨询问题。选择一位专家,获取其专业视角的建议。 |
| reviewA | 多角色会诊:邀请多位专家从不同角度评审方案,提供综合建议。 |
| brainstormC | 头脑风暴:多位专家从不同角度发散思考,产生创新想法。 |
| critiqueC | 设计评审:从多个维度批判性地审视方案,找出问题和改进点。 |
| suggestB | 场景建议:根据具体场景和约束条件,给出可执行的方案建议。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Consult is clearly distinct as a single-expert tool, but review, critique, brainstorm, and roundtable all involve multiple experts generating input, and the boundaries between comprehensive review, critical critique, and divergent brainstorming can be blurry. Descriptions help, but some tools could be confused depending on the user's intent.
All tool names are single lowercase words, which gives a consistent visual and stylistic pattern. Most are verbs (consult, review, critique, suggest, brainstorm), though 'roundtable' is a noun used as an action, so it is a minor deviation.
Six tools is well-scoped for an advisory/council server. Each tool represents a distinct consultation mode without bloating the surface, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.
The server covers single-expert advice, structured group discussion, multi-angle review, brainstorming, critique, and scenario-based suggestions, which is a fairly complete advisory toolkit. A minor gap is the lack of tools for managing or listing available experts, but users can still interact without it.