wise-council-mcp
Wise Council MCP is an MCP server that applies multiple contrasting expert frameworks to a single question, preserving disagreement rather than forcing one answer.
Roundtable: Automatically routes questions to a day (work/product/tech) or night (life/reflection) desk and gathers 3–5 relevant advisors to speak in turn, then outputs structured meeting notes (agreement, disagreement, questions, actions).
Consult: Ask a single selected advisor (e.g., tech leaders, philosophers, strategists) for their focused perspective on a question, with optional context.
Review: Run a multi-expert review of a proposal or design, optionally targeting specific focus areas (e.g., architecture, security, UX).
Brainstorm: Generate creative ideas from a group of experts across disciplines, with optional constraints to guide divergence.
Critique: Critically examine a design/architecture across selectable dimensions (architecture, usability, security, performance, maintainability, scalability, cost, team capability).
Suggest: Receive actionable recommendations for a specific scenario, with optional constraints (time, budget, tech stack, team size).
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@wise-council-mcp 开一场圆桌:要不要接受那个外地 offer?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
🌙 智囊团 MCP
Wise Council — a board of directors spanning 2,500 years across East and West
By day, you up to Zhang Xiaolong how to cut features; by night, you ask Zhuangzi how to face the thirty-five-year-old you.
Design Philosophy · Quick Start · Roundtable Process · The Seats
💡 Design Philosophy
Meta spent tens of millions of dollars building AI characters around celebrities — and they died within a year. Because it sold "celebrity skin" — the better the skin looked, the air of the core was.
The Wise doesn't play at being a celebrity; it only offers methodological thinking:
| What aligns ✅ | What collides ❌ (never align) | " | |:---------------------------|:---------------------------------------| | 议题 —— The whole room talks only about your question | Methods — Yu Jun's formulas, Laozi's metaphors, Linus's knife tongue | | Format — a speech contract: 【stance】 【reason】 【counter-question】 | Vvalues — Zhang Xiaolong's restraint × Evan You's evolution | Minutes — consensus / divergence / open questions / action items | Conclusion — divergence = the real risk surface of your decision |
What aligns is the instrument; what collides is the tune. An echo chamber has no worth — divergence is the very thing you pay for.
Related MCP server: Conclave MCP
🪟 两扇窗,两张桌
A host (triage station) automatically routes questions to the right table:
flowchart LR
Q[你的问题] --> M[🤵 司仪<br/>分诊 · 点名 · 纪要]
M -->|产品 · 技术 · 商业| D[☀️ 白天的董事会]
M -->|意义 · 关系 · 焦虑 · 抉择| N[🌙 夜晚的董事会]
D --> O[📋 会议纪要]
N --> O☀️ 白天的董事会(事业之桌)
Seat | Advisors | One-liner | |
Product | 张小龙 · 俞Jun | "Do users really need it?" | |
Design | Don Norman · Steve Krug | "Don' t make the user use their mind." | |
Architecture /Linus · Fowler · Uncle Bob · Evan You · Guido | "Talk is cheap, show me the code" | ||
Testing | Testers are the father of exploratory testing | ||
Ops/Cloud | Kelsey Hightower · Werner Vogels · Wang 坚 | ||
The data | Stonebraker · DJ Patil · Zhou Jingren | Sed out | |
Performance | G. · Yang Tao | ||
Security | "The Schnei · Wu Hanqing" | ||
Writing | Yilan Yifeng |
🌙 夜晚的董事会(人生之桌)
| Seat | Advisors | The signature move | | :---- | :---------------------------------------- |:--------------------------------- ---------------- | | Meaning | The Frankk · Silly | The Frankl wrote Manc search in / The happiness of Sisyphus | | Psychology | Adler · Jung · Epititus | Task separation / midtransition & shadow shadow / dichotomy of control | | Eastern | 老子 · 庄子 · 王brung | The right (as "nature) / the use of an use of the:the "Lu" two yyy? hmm — "use the man; / knowing & action one" use the "as as=fy" — | | | Strategy & 治理 | 孙子 · 鬼谷子 · 韩孙 子 | Win before fighting / read the trope / rewards and punishments, the two handles | | Life | Yang Lie · Shi Liesheng | "Don't be so important" / "Death is a festival that is sure to come" |
座第 39 席 · 永久列席:65 岁的你 — 不在点名表里,却出席每一场夜晚桌。所有智者发言完毕,未来的你压轴开口:"三十年后……" 全网竞品有名人 AI、有心理陪伴,没有一个是你自己。
"这两个 ..."
♾️ 两桌共用(理性审计席)spirit
*"The two councils only ha...
♾️ 两桌共用(理性审计席)
卡尼曼(认知偏差审计)+ 芒格(逆向思维) — any decision of yours cannot escape the audits of these two.
| 🕵️ 圆桌会议流程
Roundtable process:
你提问 → 司仪分诊 → 点名 3-5 位 → 圆桌发言(各持立场,严禁趋同)→ 会议纪要
真实内测示例:
问:32 岁了,体制内稳定但一眼望到头,要不要裸辞去追自己想过的生活?很焦虑 司仪分诊:🌙 夜晚的董事会 · 命中【焦虑内耗、职业人生】> 点名:庄子 · 爱比克泰德 · 阿德勒 · 王阳明 · 荣格
每人一段话(立场 / 理由 / 反问),最后输出会议纪要:共识 · 分歧 · 留给你的问题 · 本周行动项 · 一句收束
安全红线
The主持人 the built-in has mental crisis signal identification. When it detects serious pain signals, it 会议纪要 forced insert into the record as a professional psychological aid notice — the board provides views, not therapy. This is the product's moral bottom line.
🚀 快速开始
git clone https://github.com/Dream22180971/wise-council-mcp.git
cd wise-council-mcp
npm install && npm run buildRegister into Claude Desktop / MCP host:
{
"mcpServers": {
"wise-council": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["<你克隆的目录>/wise-council-mcp/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Then simply say:
"Let's roundtable: should my blog add comments?" — it takes the auto-day seat; "Let's roundtable: accept that out-of-town offer?" — it auto's the night seat.
Six tools
Tool | Used to…… |
| Full roundtable (auto-triage + roll-call + minutes) — the one to use everyday |
| Ask one advisor in one-on-one |
| Review / sharp critique |
| Brainstorm / recommended candidates |
路线图
v1.0 —— 22 位技术专家 + 5 个工具
v2.0 —— 夜桌 16 席 + 司仪分诊 + 圆桌
v2.1 —— 第 39 位:65 岁的你,永久列席夜晚做压轴
v2.2 —— 会议存档接入 agent-memory-hub (the board starts remembering you)
v3.0 —— 圆桌剧场 Web 界面 + 观点星云可视化
v3.x —— The decision gallery (every round table becomes a showroom, and "history of your own own")
📄 License
MIT © Dreamer
Ask day question of career, night of life. Same board, two windows. 🌗
Available Tools
6 toolsbrainstormC
头脑风暴:多位专家从不同角度发散思考,产生创新想法。
Inputs: topic (required), advisors, constraints.
consultA
向智囊团中的单个专家咨询问题。选择一位专家,获取其专业视角的建议。
Inputs: advisor (required), question (required), context.
critiqueC
设计评审:从多个维度批判性地审视方案,找出问题和改进点。
Inputs: design (required), advisors, dimensions.
reviewA
多角色会诊:邀请多位专家从不同角度评审方案,提供综合建议。
Inputs: proposal (required), focus, advisors.
roundtableA
召开圆桌会议:司仪自动分诊(白天桌=事业/技术决策,夜晚桌=人生探讨),点名 3-5 位相关顾问按发言契约轮流发言,最后输出统一格式的会议纪要。用户无需手动挑选专家。
Inputs: question (required), desk, context.
suggestB
场景建议:根据具体场景和约束条件,给出可执行的方案建议。
Inputs: scenario (required), advisors, constraints.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Consult is clearly distinct as a single-expert tool, but review, critique, brainstorm, and roundtable all involve multiple experts generating input, and the boundaries between comprehensive review, critical critique, and divergent brainstorming can be blurry. Descriptions help, but some tools could be confused depending on the user's intent.
All tool names are single lowercase words, which gives a consistent visual and stylistic pattern. Most are verbs (consult, review, critique, suggest, brainstorm), though 'roundtable' is a noun used as an action, so it is a minor deviation.
Six tools is well-scoped for an advisory/council server. Each tool represents a distinct consultation mode without bloating the surface, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.
The server covers single-expert advice, structured group discussion, multi-angle review, brainstorming, critique, and scenario-based suggestions, which is a fairly complete advisory toolkit. A minor gap is the lack of tools for managing or listing available experts, but users can still interact without it.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Convene a panel of expert AI personas to debate any decision from every side.
Put a decision to a council of top AI models and get one brief: verdict, splits, risks, next steps.
Ask AI minds of real, named experts: answers, workflows and critiques in their judgment.
Prep 1:1s, draft feedback and work through hard conversations at work, in your AI.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to create council hearings where multiple LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) debate topics and synthesize verdicts with trust scores and diverse perspectives.26 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to multiple frontier LLM models (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek) for consulting a "conclave" of AI perspectives, enabling peer-ranked evaluations and synthesized consensus answers for important decisions.81MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to leverage a mixture-of-agents architecture where multiple AI models discuss a question in parallel and a president model synthesizes the best answer.17 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables role-based, multi-model AI orchestration by assigning specialized expert roles to a hybrid panel of local and cloud LLMs, generating unified advisory council reports for complex tasks.68 npm1MIT