opus-advisor-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to opus-advisor-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code consult stronger AI models (o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek Reasoner) when you need deeper analysis on complex problems.1102 npm139MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling Claude to consult Codex (GPT-5.x) mid-task for second opinions, plan/diff review, brainstorming, and codebase exploration via structured debates and permission-controlled interactions.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows Claude Code to offload mechanical tasks such as summarization, classification, and drafting to a local LLM, reducing API costs while keeping Claude in control of complex reasoning and quality review.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows Claude Code to interact with the OpenAI Codex CLI.26 npm22MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables Hermes Agent to delegate development tasks to Claude Code CLI, reusing the Claude Code subscription without additional API costs.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code ask GPT Codex for adversarial planning, code review, debugging, research, and risk triage without leaving your project workflow.913 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a uniquely defined purpose: clearing the log, consulting Opus, reading the log, and reading metadata. No two tools overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily distinguish them.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., consult_opus, read_advisor_log). The naming convention is uniform across the entire set.
Four tools is a well-scoped count for an advisor MCP server. Each tool addresses a distinct need (consultation, log management, metadata access) without unnecessary extras.
The tool set covers the core operations: consultation, log reading/clearing, and metadata inspection. A minor gap is the lack of a configuration tool to adjust Opus parameters, but the current surface is sufficient for most workflows.