Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to opus-advisor-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Code consult stronger AI models (o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek Reasoner) when you need deeper analysis on complex problems.
      1
      102 npm
      139
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling Claude to consult Codex (GPT-5.x) mid-task for second opinions, plan/diff review, brainstorming, and codebase exploration via structured debates and permission-controlled interactions.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows Claude Code to offload mechanical tasks such as summarization, classification, and drafting to a local LLM, reducing API costs while keeping Claude in control of complex reasoning and quality review.
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets Claude Code ask GPT Codex for adversarial planning, code review, debugging, research, and risk triage without leaving your project workflow.
      9
      13 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a uniquely defined purpose: clearing the log, consulting Opus, reading the log, and reading metadata. No two tools overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., consult_opus, read_advisor_log). The naming convention is uniform across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped count for an advisor MCP server. Each tool addresses a distinct need (consultation, log management, metadata access) without unnecessary extras.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core operations: consultation, log reading/clearing, and metadata inspection. A minor gap is the lack of a configuration tool to adjust Opus parameters, but the current surface is sufficient for most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues