PWS MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PWS MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot to query live Jobber data—clients, jobs, quotes, invoices, revenue, and schedule—using natural language, with read-only access and careful API budget management.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with AutoTask PSA data, supporting natural language ticket queries, updates, notes, and bulk export.MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the MyWhoosh API using natural language, allowing users to create workouts, manage training sessions, schedule tasks, and adjust settings.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze Fantasy Premier League data, providing tools for player search, fixture analysis, manager comparisons, and strategy prompts for transfer planning and lineup selection.1917 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage WordPress sites through natural conversation, supporting post creation, content updates, site queries, and draft-to-publish workflows via the WordPress REST API.9MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with PostgreSQL databases using natural language queries, providing secure read-only access to database schemas and SQL translation capabilities.67 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 72 tools
The tool set is organized by clear resource domains and descriptions are detailed, but several pairs overlap (pws_get_titles vs pws_get_championships, pws_execute_action vs the purpose-built create_storyline/award_championship/sign_worker tools). With 72 entry points, an agent faces real misselection risk despite coherent naming.
Virtually all tools use the pws_ prefix, lowercase snake_case, and familiar verb_noun patterns such as pws_get_*, pws_create_*, pws_update_*, and pws_set_*. A few noun-style names (pws_company_overview, pws_database_catalog, pws_contract_advice) and bare verbs (pws_search, pws_query) keep this from a perfect 5.
At 72 tools, the server is far beyond even the 'heavy' range and into a scale that is harmful for agent tool selection. The breadth may mirror game features, but many tools could be consolidated or parameterized; this count is an extreme mismatch for a coherent MCP surface.
Coverage is impressively broad: roster, contracts, hiring, shows, segments, storylines, titles, stables, tag teams, brands, events, venues, commentary, promises, network deals, auditing, and raw SQL fallback are all represented. Minor gaps remain around network-deal negotiation and some advanced worker interactions, but pws_execute_action and query tools provide workarounds.