set_clip_property

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states the basic function and lacks disclosure of side effects, required permissions, whether properties are overwritten or appended, or error conditions when properties are invalid. The phrase 'in the current folder' is helpful but limited.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the purpose, followed by a parameter list. No unnecessary words. However, it could benefit from better structure (e.g., bullet points) and slightly more detail without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with three string parameters and an output schema exists. The description covers the core action but lacks details on allowable property names or value formats. For a setter among many similar tools, it is marginally complete but has gaps in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description should compensate. It provides minimal explanations for each parameter (e.g., 'The name of the clip') which merely restate the schema. No format constraints, allowed values, or examples are given. This adds limited value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets a clip property on a clip in the current folder, using SetClipProperty. The verb 'set' and resource 'clip property' are explicit. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like set_clip_color or set_clip_metadata, which also set clip attributes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not indicate that set_clip_property is for arbitrary property names while specialized tools like set_clip_color exist for specific properties. The description also omits prerequisites or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.