Skip to main content
Glama
Digilac

simap MCP Server

by Digilac

Related Servers

Alternatives to simap MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server providing read access to Swiss public procurement data via the official simap.ch API, covering all cantons and the Confederation with intraday updates. It enables searching tenders, awards, construction codes, and procurement offices through natural language queries.
      9
      76 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides access to Swiss public procurement tenders and awards data, queryable via natural language through the Pipeworx gateway.
      22 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve public procurement notices from 17 sources across Germany, the EU, and the UK, with filtering by country, CPV code, deadline, and contract value, plus full tender details and source freshness checks.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and retrieve detailed information about Taiwan government procurement tenders through the Government Electronic Procurement System API. It supports searching tenders by keyword, category code, date, and government unit.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, count, and validate EU public-procurement notices from the Tenders Electronic Daily database through read-only, keyless queries using keyword, country, CPV, date-range, and expert-syntax filters. It can run locally over stdio or as a token-protected HTTPS connector, returning notice titles, buyers, values, and links.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clear resource+action focus: tender search/details/history, reference-code lookups (CPV, BKP, NPK, OAG), and hierarchy browsing are well separated. The search_X_codes vs browse_X_tree split is intentionally distinct (keyword lookup vs hierarchy traversal). The only mild overlap is search_proc_offices vs list_institutions, both returning publishing entities, but descriptions differentiate them by scope.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout: search_*, get_*, list_*, browse_*. The parallel naming across the four code systems (search_cpv_codes/browse_cpv_tree, etc.) is highly predictable and reinforces the schema.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within a healthy range for a search-oriented procurement portal. The 4x2 code-system symmetry (search + browse for each of CPV/BKP/NPK/OAG) is justified by the distinct classification domains rather than redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the core read path: find tenders, get details, view publication/award history, resolve reference codes and hierarchies, list cantons and institutions. As a read-only public-portal mirror this is near-complete; minor gaps like no direct fetch of attachments/documents or saved-search management are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues