ozon_product_import_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. It only says 'status' without explaining side effects, error conditions, whether the task_id must be recently obtained, or what status values to expect. 'Status' implies read-only, but that's not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is certainly concise and front-loaded, but it under-specifies rather than economically covering the needed details. The Russian parenthetical adds a translation but no new operational meaning, so the brevity isn't fully productive.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and only a minimal description, the tool definition is incomplete. It should at least clarify that task_id comes from an import invocation and describe the kind of result returned. As written, an agent has to guess at the task lifecycle and response format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the task_id parameter. The agent is told only that task_id is a required integer, but not that it must be a task identifier returned from a prior product import call, or how to obtain such an identifier.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource (product import task) and the intent (status/info), so an agent can infer this is a read-style lookup tool. However, it lacks an explicit verb like 'get' or 'retrieve,' and it doesn't distinguish itself from sibling tools such as ozon_product_import or ozon_product_import_by_sku.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention that this should be used after creating an import task, or that it returns the current import progress. The agent is left to infer usage solely from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.