ozon_pricing_strategy_products

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only lists action names (list/add/delete) without explaining side effects, reversibility, permission requirements, or what happens when products are added or removed from a strategy.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely compact and front-loaded with the core purpose and actions. It is nearly a label rather than a full sentence, but it contains no filler words and conveys the essential operations efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what 'strategy goods' are, what list returns, what prerequisites exist (e.g., an existing strategy), or how the add/delete operations affect the strategy.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond the schema; it merely restates the action values and relies on the schema's own field descriptions for product_ids and strategy_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action set (list, add, delete) on strategy products, which are distinct from strategy-level CRUD tools. Though terse, it communicates the resource and the verbs, making the purpose understandable and distinguishable from siblings like ozon_pricing_strategy_list or ozon_pricing_strategy_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The action list hints at product-level operations, but it does not state conditions like 'when you need to modify the product composition of a pricing strategy' or exclude related strategy tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.