whatsms_admin_get_apikeys

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'optional pagination', which is a behavioral trait, and the read-only nature of 'List' is implicit. However, it does not elaborate on auth requirements, return format, or behavior when no keys exist, leaving some gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that conveys purpose and scope without any redundant words or filler. It is exactly as concise as needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a simple admin list tool, the description covers the essential purpose and hints at pagination. It lacks details about return values or filtering options, but for a basic list operation with no params and no output schema, it is sufficiently complete. A bit more context would push it to a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema defines zero parameters and has 100% coverage, so the baseline is 4. The description adds 'optional pagination' as a hint that some parameters may exist, but it does not specify names or structure. Since there are no formal parameters, the description adds a useful hint without creating confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'List' with the resource 'all API keys', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_apikey and delete_apikey. It also specifies the context 'in the WhatSMS system', making the tool's scope unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'List all API keys' clearly implies the use case—when you need to retrieve all API keys. While it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, the sibling tool set shows no other listing tool for API keys, so the context is unambiguous enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.