Skip to main content
Glama
construction-supervision-mcp

construction-supervision-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to construction-supervision-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local-first MCP server for AI-native software delivery, enabling structured specifications, human approval gates, controlled repository operations, verification evidence, review, and traceability.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered MCP server that enables Claude and other LLMs to interact directly with construction documents, drawings, and specifications through advanced RAG and hybrid search capabilities.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude, Copilot and IDE agents to interrogate a building's digital twin in plain language through seven tools covering building overview, room lists, per-room design promises, diagnosed findings, room time series, sandboxed read-only SQL and BCF issue export. Answers whether each room still meets its own design intent — and why not — instead of relying on fixed thresholds.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server providing 12 tools for Seattle-area home remodeling: real-time cost estimation across 8 project types, contractor business info, project portfolio, blog content, and quote submission. Connects via Streamable HTTP — no auth required.
      36
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to retain evidence, check explicit constraints, plan bounded work, and record outcomes through local-first MCP operations. Optional reconstruction tools also support experimental image-to-3D workflows with local model providers and Blender.
      121 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct task: guidance retrieval, checklist generation, progress recording, next-stage determination, and quotation analysis. The two stage-related tools are clearly differentiated by output type and purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as get_stage_guidance, record_project_progress, and analyze_quotation. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a construction supervision server. Each tool addresses a meaningful part of the supervision workflow without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core supervision workflow is covered: guidance, checklists, progress recording, next-stage planning, and quotation analysis. Minor gaps exist around explicit project progress retrieval and project initialization, but these can be worked around in most cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues