soundcloud_update_track

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Update metadata', which implies mutation but lacks details on side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or idempotency. The minimal description does not adequately disclose behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence. It is efficient but overly minimal for a mutation tool with many parameters. Every word earns its place, but the tool warrants more detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (multiple optional parameters, mutation) and lack of annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what fields can be updated, expected return values, or error conditions. An output schema exists but is not shown; the description itself is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

According to context, schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides. Many parameters (title, description, genre, etc.) have no descriptions in the schema either. The tool description fails to compensate for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (update) and resource (existing track), effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools like soundcloud_upload_track (which creates a new track) and soundcloud_delete_track. However, it could be more explicit about the scope of metadata updates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not discuss prerequisites, when to use update instead of upload or delete, or any context about the update process.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.