soundcloud_get_track

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description should cover behavioral aspects like auth requirements, error handling, and side effects. It only states the basic function, leaving gaps about what happens on invalid IDs or performance.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. Every part is essential.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (1 param, good input schema, output schema exists), the description is mostly complete for retrieval. It could mention that the tool returns track details as defined by the output schema, but not having that does not significantly harm usability.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema parameter description already says 'SoundCloud track ID', and the tool description adds minimal value ('by ID'). With 0% schema description coverage, the tool description should compensate but does not provide additional meaning or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get details), resource (specific track), and method (by ID). It distinguishes from sibling tools like soundcloud_create_playlist, soundcloud_delete_track, etc., which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like soundcloud_list_my_tracks. It implies usage when a specific track ID is known, but no exclusions or guidance are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.