export_role_stems
Export clip list grouped by role to plan audio mixing stems.
Instructions
Export clip list grouped by role for audio mixing stem planning
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filepath | Yes | Path to FCPXML file |
Export clip list grouped by role to plan audio mixing stems.
Export clip list grouped by role for audio mixing stem planning
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filepath | Yes | Path to FCPXML file |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description is the sole source. It implies a read-only export but doesn't confirm side effects or output destination. Adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, front-loaded with the key action and purpose. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the purpose but lacks details on output format or behavior. Adequate but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no extra meaning to the parameter. Baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Export' and resource 'clip list grouped by role' with a clear purpose 'for audio mixing stem planning'. It distinguishes from sibling export tools like export_csv and export_edl.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like filter_by_role or other export tools. Missing context about prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DareDev256/fcpxml-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server