No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 3 tools
memory_write is clearly distinct, and memory_get covers structured views, discovery, and next-action recovery while memory_context handles bounded subject-level evidence retrieval. The only real ambiguity is that both memory_get and memory_context can retrieve evidence, but their stated use cases are mostly complementary.
All three tools share the memory_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, so the set reads predictably. memory_get and memory_write are verb-based names, while memory_context is a noun phrase, creating a minor pattern break.
Three tools is on the low end, but each tool is a deliberate command hub covering a very large number of operations, so the count does not feel arbitrarily thin. The design compresses read and write surfaces into three broad endpoints rather than many small ones.
The read/write/context triad covers capture, retrieval, planning, decisions, progress, reviews, and context management, with append-only behavior making delete unnecessary. Minor gaps exist for externally referenced processes such as lesson_review and skill activation not appearing as first-class tools.