convertir_udis_a_pesos

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations and no output schema, so the description carries the full behavioral burden and delivers almost nothing: it doesn't say which UDIS rate/date source is used, what happens on non-business days, rounding behavior, or the response shape. Only the input date format is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the operation, and the date format requirement is stated. The English translation duplicates the Spanish sentence rather than adding information, which is minor padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with zero annotations, no output schema, and two undocumented parameters, the definition is too thin — an agent cannot tell what value it will get back or whether the conversion uses an exact-date UDIS rate. More context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only compensates for one of two parameters by specifying the fecha format yyyy-MM-dd. monto_udis is left completely undefined (units, decimals, sign), so the semantics of the core amount input remain opaque.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (convertir) and resource (UDIS to MXN) with an exact-date scope, which differentiates it from the currency-conversion sibling convertir_mxn_divisa. It does not explicitly name or exclude any sibling, but the operation is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this versus the many other conversion/rate siblings (get_udis_hoy, ajustar_por_udis, convertir_mxn_divisa). Usage is only implied by the tool name and the conversion direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.