botindex_solana_launches

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions '$0.02,' which might hint at a cost or fee, but this is ambiguous and not elaborated. It fails to describe critical behaviors like data format, update frequency, or any limitations, leaving significant gaps for a tool with no structured safety hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief with two short phrases, but the second phrase '$0.02' is cryptic and does not clearly contribute to understanding the tool's function. It could be more front-loaded with essential details, making it somewhat inefficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on return values, data structure, or operational constraints (e.g., rate limits, authentication). The ambiguous '$0.02' adds confusion rather than completeness, failing to provide adequate context for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description does not add parameter information, which is acceptable here, but it includes an ambiguous '$0.02' that could be misinterpreted as a parameter-related cost, slightly detracting from clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool provides 'All tracked Metaplex Genesis token launches on Solana mainnet,' which specifies the resource (Metaplex Genesis token launches) and scope (Solana mainnet). However, it lacks a clear verb (e.g., 'retrieve' or 'list') and does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'botindex_doppler_launches' or 'botindex_solana_active,' making it somewhat vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions, such as how it differs from other launch-related tools in the sibling list, leaving the agent without usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.