botindex_doppler_launches

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description fails to explain key behaviors such as whether this is a read-only operation, if it requires authentication, rate limits, pagination, or what the output format looks like. The $0.01 reference is ambiguous and doesn't add meaningful context about the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief but not well-structured or front-loaded. It consists of three disjointed phrases that don't form a coherent sentence, with the $0.01 reference being particularly confusing and wasteful. While short, it lacks clarity and effective communication of the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete for a tool that presumably returns data about token launches. It doesn't explain what information is returned, the data format, or any behavioral aspects. For a tool with one parameter but potentially complex output data, the description fails to provide adequate context for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 1 parameter with 100% description coverage ('limit' with description 'Max results (default 10)'), so the schema provides complete parameter documentation. The description adds no additional information about parameters, but with high schema coverage, the baseline score is 3 as the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Recent Doppler token launches on Base' which indicates the tool retrieves recent token launches, but it's vague about the exact action (e.g., list, fetch, display). It mentions 'New creator coins via Doppler liquidity protocol' which adds context but doesn't clarify the tool's function. The $0.01 reference is unclear and potentially misleading. It doesn't effectively distinguish from sibling tools like botindex_solana_launches or botindex_crypto_tokens.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention any prerequisites, context for use, or comparisons to sibling tools like botindex_doppler_intel or botindex_crypto_graduating. The description lacks any explicit or implied usage instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.