Long Click
LongClickExecute a long press at given coordinates on the Android screen to access context menus or perform extended interactions.
Instructions
Long click on a specific cordinate
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| x | Yes | ||
| y | Yes |
LongClickExecute a long press at given coordinates on the Android screen to access context menus or perform extended interactions.
Long click on a specific cordinate
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| x | Yes | ||
| y | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotation includes destructiveHint: true, but the description adds no behavioral details beyond restating the name. It does not explain the duration of the click, potential side effects, or what 'destructive' means in this context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, which is concise but sacrifices clarity and usefulness. It has a typo and omits critical information, making it minimally acceptable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the domain (UI automation), the complexity of 'long click' (duration, expected result), and the lack of output schema or schema descriptions, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what happens post-click or error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage for the two integer parameters (x, y). The description merely mentions 'specific cordinate' without specifying units, valid ranges, or how coordinates are interpreted (e.g., screen relative). This fails to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('long click') and target ('specific cordinate'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'Click' (short click) and 'ClickBySelector' (click by selector). The typo 'cordinate' slightly detracts but does not obscure the purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'Click' or 'ClickBySelector'. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CursorTouch/Android-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server