pulse_one_month_wonders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations. Description lists return fields and implies selection logic, but does not explain how 'giveback' is computed or if tool is read-only. Adequate but lacks detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences without fluff, front-loaded purpose and returns. Could be more structured but efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema or annotations; description lists returns but omits selection algorithm details, pagination, and giveback definition. Partially complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage 100% so baseline 3. Description adds no extra meaning about parameters (e.g., minBestMonth, limit).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool finds traders with a single big winning month then giveback, names return fields, and gives a query example. Distinguished from siblings like pulse_survivors.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit use case 'who had one great month then faded?' provided. No exclusions or alternatives mentioned, but guidance is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.