No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 106 tools
With 106 tools, many overlapping purposes exist: multiple leaderboards (pulse_leaderboard, pulse_pnl_leaders, pulse_hidden_gems, pulse_token_leaderboard, pulse_coin_kings), multiple trade feeds (pulse_recent_trades, pulse_trader_trades, pulse_cohort_trades, pulse_lifecycles_recent), and multiple OI/liquidation tools. Descriptions try to differentiate contexts, but the sheer volume and nuanced time windows make misselection likely.
Names use domain prefixes (pulse_, live_, builder_, hip4_, book_, market_) and snake_case throughout, but there is no single verb_noun pattern and inconsistencies exist (list_assets/list_asset, pulse_trader_closed_positions vs. pulse_trader_closed_position_stats). The convention is mixed but still readable.
106 tools is an extreme mismatch; far beyond the 3-15 typical range and even beyond the 50+ threshold considered extreme. While the domain is broad, the surface is massively over-scoped.
The surface appears complete for Hyperliquid analytics: markets, assets, order book depth, trader positions, PnL, cohorts, builders, HIP-4 outcomes, liquidations, and data coverage. No obvious domain gaps.