Skip to main content
Glama
CoinRithm

CoinRithm/coinrithm-agent-trading

Official

Resolve symbol -> coinId

resolve_symbol
Read-only

Resolve any symbol, slug, or asset name to the exact CoinRithm coin ID (UCID) and its disambiguating, CoinGecko-tagged alternatives before passing the correct ID to wallet, quote, or order tools.

Instructions

Resolve a human symbol / slug / name (e.g. 'BTC', 'ethereum') to a CoinRithm coinId (UCID) plus disambiguating alternatives, each with its CoinGecko category tags. Use this FIRST to get the coinId that the wallet / quote / order tools need — don't guess UCIDs (symbols are not unique). Paper trading only — virtual funds (50,000 mUSD). Not financial advice. Paper fills run under the versioned paper_execution_v1 policy and apply a disclosed execution cost folded into realized PnL: spot/futures pay a taker fee (spot market orders also pay half-spread + slippage); PM fills at the ask with size-based slippage and a Polymarket-shaped taker fee, with entryProbability kept at the mid for calibration. See the executionModel in quote/trade results — a rehearsal cost, not an exchange fill guarantee.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYesSymbol, slug, or name (e.g. BTC, bitcoin, Ethereum).
agentTraceNoOptional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesTrue when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.
bodyNoParsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON.
httpStatusYesHTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.
ledgerStatusNoLedger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.
ledgerEventIdNoPrivate AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.1.8
    • addedInput schema / properties / agentTrace
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "description": "Optional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "confidence": {
      +      "description": "Optional confidence score from 0 to 1.",
      +      "maximum": 1,
      +      "minimum": 0,
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "decisionId": {
      +      "description": "Agent decision id for quote/write attribution.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "rationaleSummary": {
      +      "description": "Optional concise rationale summary. Do not include chain-of-thought, secrets, or account identity.",
      +      "maxLength": 1200,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "runId": {
      +      "description": "Agent run id for grouping.",
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "strategyLabel": {
      +      "description": "Short strategy label, self-reported by the caller.",
      +      "maxLength": 120,
      +      "minLength": 1,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ledgerEventId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Private AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ledgerStatus
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Ledger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.1.5
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "body": {
      +      "description": "Parsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON."
      +    },
      +    "httpStatus": {
      +      "description": "HTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "True when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "httpStatus",
      +    "ok"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.1.4

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and non-destructive, but the description adds rich behavioral context: paper execution policy, fees (taker, spread, slippage), calibration details, and the rehearsal nature of results, far exceeding what annotations alone provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, but includes a lengthy list of execution details that, while valuable, could be streamlined or moved to a separate documentation section. Still, each sentence adds necessary context for correct usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (output schema exists, parameters well-documented), the description covers purpose, usage, behavioral nuances, and execution semantics comprehensively, leaving no critical gaps for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters ('q' and 'agentTrace') are fully described in the input schema (100% coverage). The description adds no additional semantics beyond restating the 'q' parameter's purpose, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it resolves human-readable symbols/slugs/names to CoinRithm coinIds plus alternatives, using a specific verb 'Resolve' and resource 'symbol', distinguishing it from sibling tools that require coinIds.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to use this tool FIRST to obtain the coinId needed by wallet/quote/order tools, warns against guessing UCIDs, and mentions paper trading constraints, providing clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.