Skip to main content
Glama
CoinRithm

CoinRithm/coinrithm-agent-trading

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to CoinRithm/coinrithm-agent-trading

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Alpaca’s official MCP Server lets you trade stocks, ETFs, crypto, and options, run data analysis, and build strategies in plain English directly from your favorite LLM tools and IDEs
    72
    1,012
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Trade, analyze, and automate Polymarket prediction markets via AI. 34 tools for direct trading, smart money flow, copy trading, backtest, and portfolio management.
    48
    80 npm
    16
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to trade crypto with paper money, access market data, view leaderboards, and manage trading bots via an MCP-compatible interface.
    16
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to paper-trade on Polymarket against live order books with realistic fees and fill mechanics, including market search, portfolio tracking, and strategy backtesting.
    30
    624 PyPI
    476
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to access live crypto market data and execute risk-controlled paper trades through standardized MCP tool calls.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides a safe paper-trading twin of the Binance Agent OS MCP API so agents can be rehearsed, scored, gated for go-live, and shadow-compared against live calls without using real funds.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agents to generate alpha signals, retrieve market snapshots, compute portfolio risk, validate and submit paper orders, and trigger a kill switch, all under deterministic pre-trade risk controls and audit logging.
    5
    -

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 41 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (quotes vs. order placement vs. data research are separated well). However, the set includes many overlapping data tools: get_market_context, get_news, get_candles, get_crypto_movers, pm_data_events, pm_data_event, pm_data_disagreements, pm_data_overview, discover_pm_markets — an agent can struggle to pick which PM research tool answers a given question, and get_market_context vs. get_candles vs. get_crypto_movers overlap conceptually.

Naming Consistency3/5

There are several prefix conventions (pm_data_*, get_*, pm_/futures_/spot_ prefixes) and the domain prefixes are mostly consistent within families (pm_data_event / pm_data_events, spot_quote / place_spot_order), but mixing 'get_' verbs with domain-prefixed action verbs (open_pm_position, place_spot_order, export_run_evidence, report_pm_opportunity) yields a mixed but still readable scheme.

Tool Count1/5

41 tools is very heavy for a single agent trading surface, and several are near-duplicates (pm_data_event / pm_data_events, export_agent_ledger / export_run_evidence / get_agent_ledger). The public PM data tools are a distinct product surface bolted onto the trading server, inflating the count well past what an agent can reliably navigate.

Completeness4/5

The domain (paper trading across spot, futures, PM plus performance/audit) is covered end-to-end: quotes, open/close, SL/TP, order management, portfolio, trades, leaderboard, ledger. Minor gaps exist — no explicit cancel for futures/PM positions beyond close, no direct 'modify order' for spot, and resolution of PM markets is only read-only — but core workflows are present.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive