mtg-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to mtg-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with 69 tools, 19 prompts, and 21 resources for deep access to Magic: The Gathering, including card data, combos, draft analytics, Commander metagame, competitive constructed, sideboard strategy, deck building, and rules engine, working with any MCP client.5629 PyPI20MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides Magic: The Gathering card, deck, provider, and statistical evidence tools for LLMs to make informed deckbuilding decisions.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with real-time access to Magic: The Gathering card data, prices, rulings, search, and synergy discovery via the Scryfall API.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants with rich Magic: The Gathering information, including card data, comprehensive rules, EDHREC recommendations, combo interactions, and intelligent Commander deck generation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to Magic: The Gathering card data via Scryfall API, enabling card search, image downloads, and database management.10 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Magic: The Gathering card data through the Scryfall API. Supports card searches, random card generation, autocomplete, set listings, and rulings lookup.221MIT
TDQS
Scored across 74 tools
Many tools have clear source prefixes, but there is functional overlap (e.g., scryfall_search_cards vs bulk_card_search, multiple deck analysis tools). Agents may struggle to choose the right tool for a given task.
Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with source prefixes (e.g., scryfall_, bulk_, moxfield_). A few outliers like 'ping' break the pattern, but overall naming is predictable.
74 tools is far above typical MCP servers. Even for a complex domain like MTG, this volume is excessive and likely burdensome for agents to navigate. Splitting into specialized sub-servers would be more coherent.
Covers a wide range of MTG needs: card lookup, deck analysis, draft, competitive meta, rules, combos, etc. Some minor gaps (e.g., no trading or event creation) but overall thorough for an informational server.