mtg-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to mtg-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with 69 tools, 19 prompts, and 21 resources for deep access to Magic: The Gathering, including card data, combos, draft analytics, Commander metagame, competitive constructed, sideboard strategy, deck building, and rules engine, working with any MCP client.5658 PyPI20MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides Magic: The Gathering card, deck, provider, and statistical evidence tools for LLMs to make informed deckbuilding decisions.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with real-time access to Magic: The Gathering card data, prices, rulings, search, and synergy discovery via the Scryfall API.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants with rich Magic: The Gathering information, including card data, comprehensive rules, EDHREC recommendations, combo interactions, and intelligent Commander deck generation.88 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to Magic: The Gathering card data via Scryfall API, enabling card search, image downloads, and database management.10 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients like Claude to build and tune Magic: The Gathering decks using live card data — Scryfall search and lookups, decklist parsing and analysis (legality, mana curve, roles, price), Commander Spellbook combo detection, and EDHREC recommendations. Supports Commander-focused tasks such as finding combos, checking card prices, and surfacing new high-synergy cards by theme or budget.12MIT
TDQS
Scored across 74 tools
Many tools have clear source prefixes, but there is functional overlap (e.g., scryfall_search_cards vs bulk_card_search, multiple deck analysis tools). Agents may struggle to choose the right tool for a given task.
Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with source prefixes (e.g., scryfall_, bulk_, moxfield_). A few outliers like 'ping' break the pattern, but overall naming is predictable.
74 tools is far above typical MCP servers. Even for a complex domain like MTG, this volume is excessive and likely burdensome for agents to navigate. Splitting into specialized sub-servers would be more coherent.
Covers a wide range of MTG needs: card lookup, deck analysis, draft, competitive meta, rules, combos, etc. Some minor gaps (e.g., no trading or event creation) but overall thorough for an informational server.