PokeMCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_pokemon_infoB | |
| simulate_battleC | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: get_pokemon_info retrieves detailed Pokémon data, while simulate_battle runs battle simulations. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_pokemon_info, simulate_battle) with clear, descriptive names that accurately reflect their functions. The naming convention is uniform throughout the tool set.
With only 2 tools, this server feels severely under-scoped for a Pokémon domain. While the tools cover information retrieval and battle simulation, there are obvious gaps in functionality like listing Pokémon, managing teams, or accessing other game mechanics, making the tool count insufficient for comprehensive Pokémon-related tasks.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a Pokémon server. It lacks basic operations such as listing Pokémon, searching by criteria, or accessing other game elements like items or locations. The two existing tools provide limited coverage, leaving agents unable to perform many expected Pokémon-related workflows.