Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to KSJ MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Privacy-first personal knowledge database for your AI that ingests data exports (Google Takeout first) and exposes them via MCP tools like search and list items. Runs locally with no cloud or telemetry.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-capable AI app to read and write a single, locally stored, user-owned journal file, so memory persists across different assistants without a cloud account. Entries are append-only and cryptographically chained, with tools for waking briefings, writing notes, searching, pinning, verifying integrity, and exporting backups.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for journaling, organizing, and recalling your work. It captures entries as plain markdown files, indexes them for full-text and structured search, and enables querying via natural language.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Turns a local folder of notes and documents into a searchable knowledge base for AI assistants via MCP, enabling semantic search, reading, and adding notes entirely on-device.
      4
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A private, local-first MCP server that gives any AI long-term memory — its own diary. Zero models, zero network, zero subscription; smarter search than Notion, running entirely on your machine.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but a few clusters risk confusion: upload_capture/manual_capture/bulk_upload all ingest captures, and find_connections/neighborhood/find_path all explore graph relationships. Descriptions clarify inputs and preconditions, so selection is usually unambiguous, but the overlaps prevent a perfect score.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use snake_case, and most follow a verb_noun pattern (get_stats, search_captures, commit_aiex). Minor deviations include noun phrases (knowledge_progress, journal_health) and adjective_noun forms (manual_capture, bulk_upload), but the scheme remains readable and predictable overall.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 37 tools, the server is well above the 25-tool threshold where the set becomes unwieldy for agent selection. Many specialized analysis, AI-dialogue prep, and export tools could be consolidated or made optional, so the count is heavy for the apparent journal-knowledge-base scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers capture ingestion, OCR/text correction, type promotion, volume configuration, entity/connection assertion, graph rebuild, search/browse, pathfinding, health metrics, AI extraction/audit/observation, and multiple export/backup paths. No obvious lifecycle dead ends exist for the core journal domain, and non-deletion is explicitly by design.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues