Skip to main content
Glama

🧠 Recall β€” a local, private knowledge-base MCP server

CI Python MCP License: MIT

Recall turns a folder of your own notes and documents into a searchable knowledge base that any AI assistant can use. It is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server: connect it to Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any MCP client, and the assistant can search, read, and add to your notes through well-defined tools.

It uses semantic search powered by local embeddings, so it finds passages by meaning, not just matching keywords β€” and it runs entirely on your machine. No API key, no cloud, your documents never leave your device.


Why this project is interesting

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) done locally β€” chunking, embeddings, and cosine-similarity retrieval, the core of modern AI knowledge systems.

  • Hybrid retrieval β€” fuses semantic and keyword results with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF), the technique production search systems use.

  • Model Context Protocol β€” exposes capabilities as tools an LLM can call, the emerging standard for connecting AI assistants to real systems.

  • Privacy-first β€” semantic search runs on-device with a small embedding model; nothing is sent to a third party.

  • Graceful degradation β€” if the embedding model can't load, it automatically falls back to keyword search instead of breaking.

Related MCP server: mcp-memory-search

See it in action

Ask Claude (with Recall connected) "search my notes for how to undo a git commit" β€” it calls the search_documents tool and answers grounded in git-cheatsheet.md, entirely on your machine.

See the difference: keyword vs. semantic

Ask "how do I undo a commit?" against a small dev knowledge base:

Search mode

Top result

Why

Keyword

the doc that literally contains the words "undo a commit"

matches exact words

Semantic

git-cheatsheet.md β†’ git revert makes a new commit that undoes an earlier one

matches meaning

Semantic search finds the genuinely useful answer even though the words don't overlap. That is the whole point of embeddings.

Retrieval quality (measured)

A small labelled eval (10 paraphrased queries over the sample docs) compares the three search modes. Semantic beats keyword clearly, especially at recall@1:

Mode

recall@1

recall@3

Keyword

40%

80%

Semantic

80%

90%

Hybrid

60%

90%

Reproduce it with python eval/run_eval.py. The corpus is small and topically overlapping, so treat the numbers as illustrative. (Pure semantic edges out hybrid here; hybrid tends to win when exact keyword matches matter β€” codes, names, error strings.) The harness is the real point: retrieval quality is measured, not assumed.

What the AI can do (the MCP tools)

Tool

What it does

search_documents(query, limit, mode)

Find the most relevant passages. mode can be auto, semantic, keyword, or hybrid.

get_document(source)

Return the full text of one document so the assistant can read or summarise it.

list_sources()

List the documents currently loaded and the active search mode.

add_note(title, content)

Save a new note into the knowledge base; it becomes searchable immediately.

How it works

        Your documents (.md / .txt / .pdf)
                 β”‚
                 β–Ό
        β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
        β”‚  DocumentStore     β”‚   1. split each file into paragraph "chunks"
        β”‚  (recall/store.py) β”‚   2. embed every chunk into a vector (local model)
        β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                 β”‚  query
                 β–Ό
        β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
        β”‚  Semantic search   β”‚   embed the query, rank chunks by cosine similarity
        β”‚  (or keyword)      β”‚   (falls back to keyword search if no model)
        β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                 β”‚  tools
                 β–Ό
        β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”        MCP (stdio / JSON-RPC)
        β”‚  FastMCP server    β”‚ ◀───────────────────────────▢  Claude Desktop,
        β”‚  (recall/server.py)β”‚                                 Claude Code, ...
        β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
  1. Chunk β€” documents (Markdown, plain text, or PDF) are split on blank lines into passages, with each Markdown heading kept attached to the text it introduces, so results land on a precise, self-contained passage.

  2. Embed β€” each chunk is turned into a vector with a local fastembed model (bge-small-en-v1.5, 384-dimensional vectors).

  3. Retrieve β€” a query is embedded and compared to every chunk by cosine similarity; the closest chunks win.

  4. Serve β€” the FastMCP server exposes search/read/write as MCP tools over stdio, so any MCP client can use them.

Quickstart

Requires Python 3.10+.

# 1. Clone and enter the project
git clone https://github.com/jaswanthsurya007-source/recall-mcp.git
cd recall-mcp

# 2. Create and activate a virtual environment
python -m venv .venv
# Windows (PowerShell):
.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
# macOS / Linux:
source .venv/bin/activate

# 3. Install
pip install -e .

# 4. Try a search from Python
python -c "from recall.store import DocumentStore; s=DocumentStore('data/documents'); print([r.chunk.source for r in s.search('how do I undo a commit', 1)])"

The first run downloads the embedding model (~66 MB) once, then caches it.

Behind a corporate proxy?

Recall uses truststore to trust your operating system's certificates automatically, so it works on networks that inspect TLS traffic (common at large companies) without extra configuration.

Connect it to Claude Desktop

Add Recall to your claude_desktop_config.json (Settings β†’ Developer β†’ Edit Config):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "recall": {
      "command": "/absolute/path/to/recall-mcp/.venv/bin/python",
      "args": ["-m", "recall.server"],
      "env": {
        "RECALL_DOCS_DIR": "/absolute/path/to/recall-mcp/data/documents"
      }
    }
  }
}

On Windows, use the full path to python.exe and escape backslashes, e.g. "C:\\path\\to\\recall-mcp\\.venv\\Scripts\\python.exe".

Restart Claude Desktop, and you'll see Recall's tools available. Ask it things like "Search my notes for how to undo a git commit" or "Save a note titled 'Meeting' with these action items…".

Use your own documents

Point Recall at any folder of .md, .txt, or .pdf files:

# macOS / Linux: set RECALL_DOCS_DIR to your own notes folder
RECALL_DOCS_DIR="/path/to/my/notes" python -m recall.server
# Windows (PowerShell)
$env:RECALL_DOCS_DIR = "C:\path\to\my\notes"; python -m recall.server

The data/documents/ folder ships with a few sample notes so you can try it immediately.

Running the tests

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q

The test suite runs fully offline (keyword mode), so it needs no model download.

Project structure

recall-mcp/
β”œβ”€β”€ .github/workflows/ # CI: ruff + pytest on every push
β”œβ”€β”€ recall/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ server.py      # FastMCP server: defines the MCP tools
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ store.py       # load β†’ chunk β†’ search (semantic, keyword, hybrid)
β”‚   └── embeddings.py  # local embedding model wrapper (fastembed)
β”œβ”€β”€ data/documents/    # sample knowledge base (.md and .pdf)
β”œβ”€β”€ tests/             # offline pytest suite (+ fixtures/)
β”œβ”€β”€ eval/              # retrieval-quality eval (recall@k)
β”œβ”€β”€ pyproject.toml     # packaging + tooling config
β”œβ”€β”€ requirements.txt
└── LICENSE

Design notes

  • Why local embeddings? Privacy and zero cost. fastembed uses ONNX runtime rather than PyTorch, so installs are small and inference is fast on CPU.

  • Why chunk by paragraph? It is simple and transparent, and it makes results land on a focused passage. A future version could use overlapping token windows.

  • Why a fallback to keyword search? A tool should never hard-fail. If the model can't be downloaded, search still works β€” just less cleverly.

  • Re-indexing on write is a full reload for clarity; at larger scale you would embed only the newly added chunks.

Roadmap

  • Retrieval-quality eval harness (recall@k)

  • Hybrid search (Reciprocal Rank Fusion of semantic + keyword)

  • PDF document support

  • Persist embeddings to disk so startup is instant on large corpora

  • Support HTML documents

  • Optional LLM-generated summaries via the Claude API

  • Expose documents as MCP resources, not just tools

License

MIT

Available Tools

4 tools
add_noteA

Save a new note to the knowledge base and index it immediately.

Args: title: A short title; also used to name the file. content: The note body (plain text or Markdown).

Returns: A confirmation with the created document's source name.

Inputs: title (required), content (required). Returns: result

get_documentA

Return the full text of one document by its source name.

Use list_sources first to see valid names. The caller can then read or summarise the returned text.

Inputs: source (required). Returns: result

list_sourcesB

List the documents in the knowledge base and the active search mode.

Inputs: no named parameters. Returns: result

search_documentsA

Search the knowledge base for passages relevant to a query.

Args: query: What to look for, in natural language or keywords. limit: Maximum number of passages to return (1-50, default 5). mode: "auto" (semantic if available, else keyword), "semantic", or "keyword". Use "keyword" to force exact-word matching.

Returns: The most relevant passages, each labelled with its source and score.

Inputs: query (required), limit, mode. Returns: result

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: adding notes, retrieving a specific document, listing sources, and searching. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: add_note, get_document, list_sources, search_documents. The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    4 tools is slightly below average but still reasonable for a focused knowledge base server. It covers core operations without being too sparse or excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set provides create, read, and search capabilities but lacks update and delete operations. This is a significant gap for managing a knowledge base, as agents cannot modify or remove notes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessLimited data

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local semantic and full-text search over Markdown notes through MCP, returning relevant passages ranked by meaning and exact terms without requiring a GPU or hosted APIs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns any folder of PDFs, markdown, and text files into a local, queryable knowledge base exposed as an MCP server. Enables MCP-compatible agents to semantically search indexed documents, retrieve relevant passages with source and relevance scores, list or reindex documents, and inspect cache and token usage β€” instead of reading whole files into context.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic and full-text search over markdown notes, with tools to create, edit, move, and delete notes, all through MCP. Runs entirely locally using Ollama for embeddings and SQLite for storage, working with Obsidian or standalone.
      MIT