get_v1_kaspa_derivatives_blocks_block_hash

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions 'Informational research data — not investment advice' and 'Price: $0.02', which are minor behavioral traits. However, it lacks details on side effects, rate limits, authentication requirements, or idempotency. Given the absence of annotations, more transparency is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences plus price and category. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and key details. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given it's a single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description offers a reasonable overview of the response content (DAG topology fields). However, the parameter confusion and lack of guidance on expected block_hash format reduce completeness. It also doesn't mention whether the full block data is included.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has one parameter 'block_hash' with description mentioning examples like BTC, ETH, SOL, which is confusing for a Kaspa-specific tool. The main description does not clarify the correct format or expected values. Schema description coverage is 100%, but the provided description is misleading, and the main text adds no additional meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it extracts a single Kaspa block with full DAG topology, including specific fields like parents, selected-parent, blue/daa score, and chain-block flag. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by specifying 'single block extract' and 'full DAG topology', contrasting with other Kaspa tools that cover recent blocks, supply trends, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. It says 'AI agent API for DAG-aware indexers' but does not mention when not to use it or point to sibling tools like get_v1_kaspa_derivatives_recent_blocks or get_v1_kaspa_derivatives_dag_state for different use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.