get_v1_btc_derivatives_blocks_height

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description lists return metrics and notes price and category, but does not disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, rate limits, or side effects. It provides some transparency but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single sentence listing many metrics plus two short sentences for price and category. It is concise and front-loads the key information, but the list could be more structured (e.g., bullet points).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single parameter and no output schema, the description covers the return values adequately but lacks context on how the height parameter works exactly (e.g., numeric block height vs. asset symbol). The schema description for 'height' is ambiguous, but the description does not clarify.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'height', so baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning about the parameter beyond what the schema provides. It mentions 'per-block' implying height, but no extra detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it returns per-block Bitcoin data with a specific list of metrics. The verb 'returns' and resource 'per-block Bitcoin extract' are clear. It somewhat distinguishes from sibling 'get_v1_btc_derivatives_blocks_range' by focusing on a single block by height, but does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, when not to use, or which sibling tools might be better for different scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.