browser_close
Close the active browser session to complete automation tasks and release system resources.
Instructions
Close the browser session.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Close the active browser session to complete automation tasks and release system resources.
Close the browser session.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Close the browser session' without mentioning that all pages are closed, session state is lost, or that the browser must be restarted with browser_start afterward. The destructive finality is implied but not stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundant information. It is appropriately sized for a parameterless tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The core action is stated, and the tool is simple with no parameters or output schema, but the description omits important context such as the session being fully terminated and the distinction from browser_close_page. Slightly more detail would make it robust for an agent operating among many browser siblings.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and an empty input schema, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. The baseline for 0-parameter tools applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Close') and resource ('the browser session'), which clearly identifies the tool's function. It is implicitly distinct from browser_close_page, which targets a single page, but it does not explicitly name or contrast that sibling.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus browser_close_page or other browser lifecycle tools. The description does not explain that this ends the entire session or that browser_close_page should be used to close only the current page.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.