go_to_frame

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully communicate behavioral traits, but it only states the basic action. It does not disclose what happens if the index does not exist or if there are side effects (e.g., changing active layer). This is insufficient for a navigation command.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that contains all necessary information without redundancy or fluff. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details on edge cases (e.g., invalid index) or expected behavior. Without annotations, completeness is moderate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% description coverage for the single parameter 'index', so the description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already conveys. Baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Navigate' and the resource 'a specific frame', making its purpose unmistakable. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like add_frame, delete_frame, and duplicate_frame by focusing on navigation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., add_frame to create a new frame, or list_frames to see available frames). There are no exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.