item_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly warns that deletion is permanent and irreversible, which is the most critical behavior for a delete tool. It does not cover permissions or return values, but the core risk is clearly communicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no filler. 'Permanently delete an item from a 1Password vault' is front-loaded and immediately actionable, followed by the critical warning. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (two required string parameters) and the description fully conveys the action and its permanence. It does not mention return values, but for a delete operation this is less critical. Given no output schema and no annotations, the description sufficiently covers the context, though it could add 'on success' or error behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full descriptions for both parameters (itemId and vaultId), and schema coverage is 100%. The tool description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'permanently delete an item from a 1Password vault'. It clearly distinguishes from siblings like item_archive by emphasizing permanence, and from item_edit by focusing on deletion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description makes it clear that this tool is for irreversible removal ('This action cannot be undone'), which implies when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives (e.g., item_archive for reversible deletion) or when not to use it. The context is clear but lacks explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.